Ambiguity implies having two possible operational meanings within a sole concept. This is implicit in the etymology of the word ambiguity.

These two meanings imply on one hand a meaning that is functional to human internal freedom and on the other hand another meaning that is functional to the need of internal security.

But there is another ambivalence in an ambiguity which is based on its functionality towards expansion or contraction.

This description is an example of ambiguity. Only an ambiguous model can grasp an ambiguous reality.

An ambiguous language is essential when a communication between two individuals is based on mutual responsibility. Ambiguous communication requires biunivocity. Inter-communication is necessary to deal with ambiguity in order to agree on a common operational meaning.

Responsibility avoidance deals with operational language

An operational communication is univocal. Therefore the transmitter is responsible for the functionality of the communication. The responsibility of the receiver is to decode the message, without needing to interpret possible meanings.

Reality is ambiguous when we are dealing with complex problems because the cause-effect relations are biunivocal. In this case ambiguous language is necessary to deal with them in order to assume the responsibility for results. But it has to be considered that efficiency is based on the use of straightforward operational language.

The fallacious myths in communication

Dealing with ambiguity requires knowledge, awareness and responsibility. Managing the nature of businesses implies dealing with their ambiguity.

An enormous stupefying effort to minimize human responsibility has been made by:

a)  Honoring common sense although, at least since Plato, it is known that it is based on rigid experience-based thoughts that might or not be valid for a different reality.

b)  Disqualifying ambiguous communication by projecting multiple meanings on its interpretation to avoid the responsibility of managing complex problems.

That is why it is necessary to have the technical analytical knowledge, a high level of consciousness and having assumed the responsibility to produce a predefined result.

The path towards managing ambiguity is long but interesting.

Learning to deal with ambiguity

Ambiguity management can be learned if an individual knows and accepts her/his level of internal freedom.

A football champ once said:

“The more I train the luckier I am”

Solving riddles is a simple way to approach ambiguity. Riddles have many solutions. In the Far East, riddles are used to develop internal freedom and responsibility.

If you want to expand your capacity to manage ambiguity we recommend entering:
http://www.unicist.net/partners-news/unicist-riddles-honoring-bricks/

Autocracy and anarchy deal with universal and individual
operational truths using operational language.
Democracy requires ambiguity…..

You decide…..

Survivors cannot accept ambiguity because they need
to hold on “their” truths,  sorry, I meant lifeboats.

You decide…..

Access the unicist standard contained in the Unicist Standard Search Engine:
http://www.unicist.com/

Request more information: n.i.brown@unicist.org

Peter Belohlavek

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the major research organization in the world in its specialty based on more than 3,000 researches in complexity science applied to individual, institutional and social evolution. The applicative researches are based on the discovery of the Ontogenetic Intelligence of Nature and the consequent Unicist Theory of Evolution.

If you would like to receive monthly information on this blog, please register here.

Although there is an object driven strategy that can be designed and developed, negotiating is an art because of the subjective aspects that are involved.

Negotiation implies integrating the interests of individuals or institutions that are divergent. For this purpose, a superior convenience needs to be found.

A unicist negotiation strategy requires achieving an agreement at different levels:

The levels of negotiation are:

1)      The negotiation of the roles: It implies defining the acceptance of the roles of the participants in a negotiation.

2)      The power negotiation: defining the destruction and construction power of the participants.

3)      The business negotiation: defining the value added by each part.

4)      The negotiation of the complementation: defining the activities to be developed in order to sustain complementariness.

Institutional negotiation requires different roles that have to be covered.

Access the complete information at: http://www.unicist.net/partners-news/unicist-object-driven-business-negotiation-strategy/

Request more information: n.i.brown@unicist.org

Press Committee

NOTE: The Unicist Research Institute is the major research organization in the world in its specialty based on more than 3,000 researches in complexity sciences applied to individual, institutional and social evolution.

The Unicist Research Institute invites companies to integrate Market-Labs Consortia to develop the use of Social Networks as market catalysts.

The Unicist Market-Lab has been opened to develop Business Consortia after 3 years of using, monitoring and researching the functionality of Social Networks. The research was led by Peter Belohlavek.

It has been demonstrated that Social Networks besides working as a market channel work also as market catalysts for a broad spectrum of products and services.

Four social networks have been considered as paradigmatic examples of their segments: Facebook, LinkedIn, Xing and Twitter. Google has developed from a search engine to a “Multi-minority” Social Network.

In this first step we estimate that the business to be catalyzed using Social Networks exceeds 5,000 billion dollars.

The Unicist Research Institute invites companies to integrate Market-Lab Consortia to use Social Networks as sales catalysts.

You can find information on the Unicist Standard  in the Unicist Business Search Engine: http://www.unicist.com

Request more information: n.i.brown@unicist.org

Press Committee

To translate this post, click on the title to open it and then click on your flag in the right menu.

If you would like to receive monthly information on new scientific developments, please register here.

Unicist reflection is a process that has been developed and designed to add value deal with complex situations. It is necessary to approach complex problems and transform them into simple solutions.

The physical framework of unicist reflection process defines the possibilities of achieving the results proposed at the level participants are able to operate.

The Unicist Standard provides the basic tools with which to work, influences on the expectations of participants and defines the accepted limits of its development and the results that can be obtained.

It is needed to make the destructive and non destructive tests (applications) while reflecting on their results to find the adequate solution for the complex problem.

It is extremely simple but not easy.

You can find information on the Unicist Standard  in the Unicist Business Search Engine: http://www.unicist.com

Request more information: n.i.brown@unicist.org

Diego Belohlavek
Expert System Manager

To translate this post, click on the title to open it and then click on your flag in the right menu.

If you would like to receive monthly information on new scientific developments, please register here.

The Unicist Standard in Businesses began as a conceptual business design standard. It uses the Unicist Object Driven Strategy, Unicist Object Driven Organization and Unicist Object Driven Management to emulate the structure of nature.

Access the Unicist Standard at: http://unicist.info/sdc-en/unicist-standard/

You can find information on the Unicist Standard  in the Unicist Business Search Engine: http://www.unicist.com

Request more information: n.i.brown@unicist.org

Your comments are welcome.

Press Committee

To translate this post, click on the title to open it and then click on your flag in the right menu.

If you would like to receive monthly information on new scientific developments, please register here.

The purpose of a decision making process is to be able to make decisions that are justified and grounded. This requires a unicist thinking process in order to be able to integrate justifications with foundations.

Decisions are produced because they are needed. When there is no need to decide, the decisions become just a utopia the individual has in mind to deal with reality.

That is why decisions exist when they are implemented. If not, they are just an alternative that will be considered when time for decision making comes.

To avoid fallacies with paradoxical results in decision making, we need to integrate justifications with groundings, avoiding the exertion of  power to impose one’s justifications.

Free access to a Peter Belohlavek’s video presentation on decision making: http://www.slideboom.com/presentations/72885/What-is-Unicist-Decision-Making%3F

You can find information on Unicist Thinking in the Unicist Business Search Engine: http://www.unicist.com

Request more information: n.i.brown@unicist.org

Your comments are welcome.

Diana  Belohlavek
VP Unicist Knowledge Manager

To translate this post, click on the title to open it and then click on your flag in the right menu.

If you would like to receive monthly information on new scientific developments, please register here.

Use it now!!!

Promote your business activity
… equal opportunities for all
click here